🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is seeking damages valued at $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This action represents a clear warning from the Kremlin regarding plans to use frozen Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to reports in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials are set to decide later this week on a plan to use approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and financial stability.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the main keeper for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union officials have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the fact that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in European jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has called any utilization of the funds as theft. It has warned of retaliatory actions, such as seizing European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a key position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a severe assault on property rights and the international reserves system created by the United States."

Euroclear refused to comment on the latest legal action. The institution has in the past stated it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While courts in EU countries are unlikely to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to pursue implementation in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that such assets can be located," stated a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities indicated they are developing measures to discourage other nations from aiding any Russian lawsuits against EU companies. They are also crafting safeguards to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex plan, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would remain unaffected.

Ukraine would only be required to return the money if and when Russia consented to pay reparations for the immense destruction caused during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, however, requires unanimity among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has already signaled its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she stated. "It also delivers a clear signal that when you do all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."