🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.